苏尔特元帅的个性

月光丸

关于元帅个性和工作态度，人们的评价好像有所出入
大家都说苏尔特元帅任北方军团参谋长时个性慵懒，缺乏条理而无法胜任
但据说他早年因对工作认真负责而赢得同事普遍赞誉，并被迅速提升
不明白哪个是实情。另外，各位有没有关于他早年表现和后来任参谋长时的失误的描述呢
啊，最好他“本人”出面解释下

朔风

我觉得，这取决于其所担当的职务。

参谋军官有四种...第四种，身体懒惰但头脑聪慧，这种人最适合担任高级参谋长。-冯.曼施坦因

高守业

没人想要奖励的话我可要回答了

高守业

大兵团的两篇文章即可解决楼主的问题：
第一篇 风哥写的《1799年瑞士战局全景简述》
http://bbs.napolun.com/viewthread.php?tid=27499&from=recommend_f
第二篇 铁公爵转的《林尼战役》
http://bbs.napolun.com/viewthread.php?tid=24963&extra=page%3D1

月光丸

终于绕明白了，就像专业的工兵去当炮兵，工作情况自然不同了

高守业

回复 5# 月光丸
   个人感觉虽然苏尔特不是最好的参谋长人选，但除了造成15日第1第3军外他的表现还算中规中矩。
令 半岛战争塔拉维那战役后约瑟夫的参谋长儒尔当被免职，他的职务由苏尔特接替。因此关于苏尔特未接触过参谋工作的说法并不正确。

月光丸

其实元帅在1794年就担任勒费弗尔旅长的参谋长，并且在1799年后勒费弗尔（已升为师长）回国休养，他才转为该师师长，只能猜测他一直没做好，但是担任参谋可不是第一次了

iron duke

苏尔特在勒费弗尔下当参谋长，表现可以说是智勇双全。
http://napoleonic-literature.com/Book_15/V1C10.htm

At the battle of Fleurus, in 1794, he was chief of the staff under Lefebvre, and there exhibited that admirable coolness and penetration in the hour of danger which afterward made him so conspicuous as a military leader. General Marceau commanded the right of the army, and his division at Ardennes was hurled back by a charge of the enemy and thrown into disorder. Marceau, in despair, hurried to Soult and asked for four battalions to help him restore the combat. But the latter saw he could not grant his request without endangering Lefebvre's division, and refused. Marceau, in the agony and confusion of the moment, threatened to shoot himself if he was not aided. Soult told him to be calm and steady. "Rally your men to the charge," said he, "and the four battalions shall come as soon as possible." The words were scarcely out of his month before Prince Coburg was on him like a rolling torrent, and Soult was in a moment in the thickest of the fight. After the battle was over Marceau sought him out, and generously begged his pardon for his rudeness and praised him for his valor.

月光丸

那只能说他是参谋部的内伊了

iron duke

是有些类似内伊。
苏尔特当参谋长有些基础，素质和潜力也不差。但给的磨合时间太短(从上任至开战1个半月)，跟参谋部的工作配合、以及适应大军团参谋长的工作特点节奏等还欠火候。
要说大错，苏尔特很少有，但是如同1794弗勒吕斯那样的杰出表现，也难以看到了。