12月3日，纪念一下霍恩林登会战210周年

iron duke

马尔蒙评说，莫罗在主战场仅集中起了手头12个师的6个师。
At Hohenlinden, where the success was so overwhelming, Moreau ought to have been defeated, and he probably would have been, if the Austrians had not manoeuvred with a carelessness unexampled. The French army was composed of twelve divisions; the three of the right were commanded by General Lecourbe, and the three of the left, General Sainte-Suzanne commanding, did not assist in the battle. The Austrian army was united, but marched unconnectedly; the centre column, which encountered no obstacle, and followed the main road, with almost all the artillery, was open to an isolated attack, and not even formed; it was liable, at any moment, to be assailed in flank. This remarkable fortune was not due to the dispositions of General Moreau. General Richepanse, a man of mind and courage, finding himself with his division surrounded by the Austrians, who began to organize, faced about, and seized one hundred piece of cannon, marching by column upon the high road.

蓝色拿破仑

打倒波拿巴，打倒克西嘉恶魔，
莫罗万岁，共和国万岁！
小苏尔特 发表于 2010-12-8 19:27

苏尔特，你知道朕最恨的就是叛徒！

你失宠了。

小苏尔特

莫罗仓促间打了胜仗。
话说苏尔特1800年的能力还不如莫罗呢，当然佩服了，无论是对共和国的忠心还是对国家的爱还是战场指挥。

小苏尔特

莫罗和苏尔特都有共同之处啊，靠部下打仗，自己谋划布局。

iron duke

苏尔特1799才独立指挥较大战役部队。1800年前从战功比，比不上的恐怕要超过30个。能力就不好说了，早在1794弗勒吕斯，名将马索跟苏尔特怎么说的：“上校，你的官阶比我低，但今天给我上了一课。” 从战略能力讲，苏尔特刚成名那时就不见得低于莫罗。
苏尔特是战略上调动起尽量的优势，布局尽可能合理。莫罗呢，至少马尔蒙说法看，是该赢的局，摆成了该输的局，靠里什庞斯的超强发挥，把该输的仗扳成大胜。

蓝色拿破仑

这么说莫罗是个不能让人轻视的鸡肋级将领。

小苏尔特

回复 15# iron duke


    这么说拿破仑在马伦哥也摆了个臭棋，应该集中兵力的时候他分散部队做无用的搜索，理应的败仗却被部下德赛的神勇给打赢了。

iron duke

正好，马尔蒙在评价莫罗的前一段，就讲到马仑哥是拿破仑早期作战布局中唯一例外的失招。
All of his first campaigns have had this character, except at Marengo, where, deviating from this principle, he was about to succumb ; upon the day of action he is always seen to reassemble, upon the field of battle, all the forces he could reasonably dispose of.
相对莫罗，1796和1799两次，战略上都多少有问题。

iron duke

马尔蒙到整段评论，按第18，9，11楼的顺序。

小苏尔特

1800年 在马伦哥和霍恩林登，两个统帅所犯的错误，历史惊人的相似。