207-219页 损失统计——全部完成

王法拉

这个比较慢，要查对的比较多，还要做一些表格，目前完成一多半，又逢考试，还要照顾王二狗，预计十一月份内完成吧

装甲掷弹熊

损失统计里面有的内容是引用俄军事后的表格，可以参照这个帖子
http://bbs.napolun.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=37226

王法拉

装甲掷弹熊 发表于 2013-9-24 23:19
损失统计里面有的内容是引用俄军事后的表格，可以参照这个帖子
http://bbs.napolun.com/forum.php?mod=vie ...

正有此意。俄军单位的名称也准备照此替换，不知是否合适？

王法拉

207页


Battle reports revealed immense casualties on both sides, placing the Battle of Borodino among the bloodiest combats in history. In his letter to Alexander, Kutuzov described it as ‘the bloodiest of all the battles known in modern times’.532 One Russian officer, who went on to serve in the 1813–14 campaigns, reflected the prevailing opinion on Borodino when he noted: ‘In my life I participated in a whole series of general engagements as well as a variety of other operations, and I discovered that they stood in the same relation to Borodino as peacetime manoeuvres did to the realities of war itself.’

        双方的战报都披露了巨大的损失，这让博罗季诺战役成为史上最血腥的搏杀。在库图佐夫给亚历山大的信中，他认为“有史以来，博罗季诺战役最为血腥”。一位在1813-1814年战争中继续服役的俄军军官的意见代表了人们的普遍看法——“在我的一生中，一般的战役不胜枚举，各种各样的行动也都经历，可我发现它们跟博罗季诺比起来，简直就是和平演习。”

        

王法拉

208页


The precise number of casualties is hard to establish and estimates vary between sources, causing one modern historian to note that casualty estimates oftentimes are ‘guess-timates’.533 Many French documents perished during the dreadful winter retreat of 1812, while Russian roll-calls and battle reports are often incomplete or vague, while some have been lost.

        由于数据来源不同，精确的伤亡数字很难得出，后世的史学家只能靠推测来进行估计。许多法国的记录档案随着1812年冬季的溃退而不复存在，而俄国战报往往语句模糊，统计不足，并且很多资料也已经遗散了。

         Besides the problem of sources, there is an issue of contrasting viewpoints of the battle – the French (and English) participants and then scholars considered the battles of Shevardino and Borodino as separate actions, while the Russians believed, and still do, that they constitute parts of one major engagement. Thus, Russian studies often refer to Borodino as a two-day battle fought on 24–26 August (5–7 September). This is an important distinction, since the French data on casualties usually includes only those suffered on 7 September, while the Russians combined losses sustained in the actions of 5 and 7 September.

        除了不同的数据来源，关于战役时间的确认也是个问题——法国的（包括英国）亲历者和学者认为舍瓦尔季诺和博罗季诺的战斗并不属于同一个战役，而俄国学者相信这两场战斗都是博罗季诺战役的组成部分。因此，俄国文献资料中的博罗季诺是发生在8月24-26日（俄历，公历9月5-7日）。这是一个重要的不同点，因此法国的损失统计仅涵盖了9月7日的数据，而俄国人则包括了9月5-7日。

         Two days after the battle, in a letter to his father-in-law, Emperor Francis of Austria, Napoleon acknowledged 8,000–10,000 French losses and ‘40,000–50,000 Russians killed and wounded, sixty guns and many prisoners’. The 18th Bulletin, issued on 10 September, claimed that
         12,000 to 13,000 men, and from 8,000 to 9,000 Russian horses, have been counted on the field of battle: sixty pieces of artillery and 5,000 prisoners have remained in our power. We have had 2,500 killed and thrice that number wounded. Our total loss may be estimated at 10,000, that of the enemy at from 40,000 to 50,000. Never was there seen such a field of battle. Out of every six dead bodies, there were five Russians for one Frenchman.

        两天后，再给岳父——奥皇弗朗西斯的信中，拿破仑说法军损失在8000到10000人，而给俄军造成“40000-50000士兵、60门大炮和许多俘虏的打击”。9月10日发布的第18号公报宣称：俄军战场遗尸12000-13000人，8000-9000匹马，60门火炮，五千俘虏见证了帝国军威。我军有2500人光荣牺牲，英勇负伤者三倍于此。我们总体损失约10000人，而敌人则是40000-50000。敌我双方伤亡比例为5:1。

          That same day, however, Kutuzov penned his own report and, after claiming victory, he acknowledged his heavy losses (without specifying them) and estimated Napoleon’s loss at 40,000. The official battle account, prepared after the battle but not made public until many years later, recognized 25,000 killed and wounded in the Russian Army and over 40,000 in the French.534

        同一天，库图佐夫在发出捷讯后写下了自己的报告，其中承认俄军遭到了巨大的损失（但没有详细的说明），也对拿破仑的伤亡做出了估计——约4万人。官方的战报直至多年后才公布，宣传俄军伤亡25000人，法军则超过40000。

         Russian imperial scholars estimated between 44,000 and 55,000 Russians losses and 28,000–50,000 French casualties. Bogdanovich’s figures – 44,000 Russian and over 28,000 French casualties – were largely accepted by later historians until the establishment of the USSR. Soviet scholars produced figures driven by ideological concerns and claimed some 58,500–60,000 French losses. Scholars deviating from this line were pressured to adhere to it. Thus, in 1943, Eugène Tarle referred to some 50,000 French and 58,000 Russian losses, but was then forced to revise his figures to 58,500 on the French side and 42,000 on the Russian for his 1962 study.

        帝俄学者估计俄军损失了44000-55000人而法军则超过28000。波格丹诺维奇（Bogdanovich）的数据“俄军44000，法军过28000”被长久引用。直到苏联时代，充满意识形态斗争色彩的“法军损失58500-60000”占据了上风，持异见者必须要服从这一数据。因此，尤金·塔勒（Eugène Tarle）在1943年研究中认为“50000法军损失，58000俄军损失”的数据在1962年版本中被迫改为了“58500法军损失，42000俄军损失”。

王法拉

209页

The figure of over 58,000 French casualties was first made public in 1813,when a Swiss officer Alexander Schmidt defected to Russia and claimed that hehad served under Berthier. Schmidt, remarkably, could recall the precise numberof losses Napoleon’s troops suffered at Borodino, though his reliability shouldhave been doubted after he claimed that Reynier VII Corps was present there!Despite such fraudulency, Governor Rostopchin of Moscow utilized Schmidt’sfigures in his propaganda publications, hoping to boost Russian morale. Insubsequent decades, some scholars, seeking to embellish Russian actions, basedtheir estimates on Rostopchin’s pamphlets, gradually making the figure of over58,000 French losses seem genuine. Modern Russian historians revised thesefigures and their current estimates place Russian losses between 45,000 and50,000 and those of the French at approximately 35,000. Each side had about1,000 men captured.

        法军58500的战损首先出于1813年，声称是贝尔蒂埃前下属的瑞士官员亚历山大·施密特（Alexander Schmidt）叛逃到了俄国。施密特所声称的法军精确损失数字可信度值得怀疑，比如他提到雷尼耶（Reynier）的第7军参与了博罗季诺战役（第7军根本不在！）。尽管存在种种质疑，莫斯科地方长官罗斯托普钦为了鼓舞士气，仍将其用于公开宣传。在后十年中，一些学者为了鼓吹俄军的战绩，用罗斯托普钦宣传册作为研究依据，这渐渐使得“法军战损超过58000”的说法成为“真相”。当代俄国史学家修正了这个数据，他们认为俄军战损在45000到50000之间，法军则约为35000.双方都有约1000人被俘。

      TheAllied participants give significantly different estimates. Dominique Larrey believed that the French lost 12–13,000 ‘hors de combat’ and 9,500 wounded. Girod de l’Ain estimatedsome 15,000 losses, Soltyk – 18,000, while Berthezene, noting that somecolonels tried to conceal the real figures, referred to 22,600 casualties.Chambray, Meneval and Dedem estimated between 28,000 and 30,000 losses whileLejeune gave the highest estimate with forty-eight generals, ten colonels andsome 40,000 soldiers killed or wounded. At the time, the mostdetailed analysis of French losses was done by Baron Denniée,Inspector of Reviews of the Grand Army, who prepared initial reports for Berthier,but due to the high number of losses they revealed, he was told to keep themsecret. Denniée finally made them public in his Itinéraire de l’Empereur Napoléon in 1842, revealing theloss of forty-nine generals (ten killed), thirty-seven colonels (ten killed),6,547 officers and soldiers killed, and 21,453 men wounded. Denniée’s figures,despite their shortcomings, had a lasting influence, since virtually allsubsequent authors accepted and repeated them. Currently, most Western accountsgive Napoleon’s losses at 28,000–30,000 men and estimate between 44,000 and50,000 for Kutuzov’s troops. Denniée’s estimates, however, seem to exclude thelosses (4–5,000 men) that the Grand Army suffered on 5 September, since itwould be incredible to assume that the French lost less than 25,000 men atBorodino. Therefore, if one adds the casualties of 5 and 7 September – asRussian studies have done for Kutuzov’s army – then the combined French lossessustained on 5–7 September would be in the vicinity of 34,000–35,000 men.

        联军方面给出了截然不同的数据。多米尼克·拉雷（Dominique Larrey）认为法军有12000-13000人丧失了战斗力（hors de combat），还有9500人受伤。吉罗德·德·里安（Girod de l’Ain）估计损失了约 15,000人，硕泰克（Soltyk）则是 18,000， 而贝尔特泽纳（Berthezene）发现某些上校试图篡改数字，他认为损失数目应在22600左右。尚布雷（Chambray）, 梅纳瓦尔（Meneval） 和德代(Dedem)认为28000-30000的数据比较合理，勒热纳（Lejeune）则给出了最高估计，48名将军、10名上校和约40000官兵在战斗中死伤。在当时，登尼男爵（Baron Denniée）给出了最为详细的资料分析。大军团的统计调查员在给贝尔蒂埃的报告初稿中提及了这个可怕的数字，由于损失过于惨痛，调查结果未作公开。登尼在1842年《Itinéraire de l’Empereur Napoléon》这本书中，把这个数据首次公布，49位将军（10人战死），37名上校（10人战死），军官和士兵则有6547名阵亡，21453人负伤。登尼的数据虽然存在一些问题，但仍产生了深远的影响，后世的学者大多同意并引用了他的成果。现在的西方学者普遍接受的是拿破仑损失28000-30000人，库图佐夫44000-50000人。登尼估计，不计在9月5日战斗中失去的4000-5000人，那博罗季诺战役联军的损失在25000之下。因此，如果人们像俄国学者计算库图佐夫损失的方法那样，计算9月5-7日的战斗损失，那么法军的损失就会达到34000-35000人。

      Detailson French regimental losses are lacking but some data is available.Hourtoulle’s study showed that the 17th Line lost twenty-five officers killedand forty-six wounded, while the 9th Line had eight officers and seventy-threemen killed, thirty-one officers and 713 men wounded. The 30th Line, which hadsome 3,000 men in late August, tallied less than 300 after the battle.Montesquiou de Fezensac was

struck by the exhaustion of thetroops and their numerical weakness […] The 4th Line was reduced to 900 men outof the 2,800 which had crossed the Rhine; thus four battalions now formed buttwo when mustered, and each company had a double complement of officers andnon-commissioned officers. All of their equipment, and particularly theirshows, were in a dilapidated state […] Never had we suffered such heavy losses;never had the morale of the Army been so shaken.535

        法军团级单位损失的情况缺失不全，但某些数据则有迹可循。乌尔图勒（Hourtoulle）的研究显示第17线列步兵团损失了71名军官（25人死亡，46人受伤），而第9线列步兵团则有8名军官和73名士兵死亡，31名军官和713名士兵受伤。第30线列步兵团在8月下旬还有约3000人，战斗之后不足300。孟德斯鸠·德·费藏萨克（Montesquiou de Fezensac）为法军的虚弱深感震惊。第4线列步兵团渡过莱茵河时尚有2800人，此时已减员至900；下设的四个营几乎缩编一半，军官和军士超标一倍。他们所有的装备，特别是军礼服都破烂不堪。法军从未遭到如此大的损失，军团的士气也前所未有地动摇了。

王法拉

210页

Among the cavalry units, the 4th Chasseurs had one officer killed and tenwounded, the 6th Lancers lost four officers killed and four wounded. Roth vonSchreckenstein recorded the loss of thirty-nine officers and 287 men killed andtwenty-nine officers and 323 men wounded in Thielemann’s Saxon brigade, whichalso lost 610 horses. Preysing-Moos recorded in his diary that his Bavariantroops lost five officers and around 100 men. According to von Dittfurth, theWürttemberg cavalry lost 34 killed, 274 wounded and 10 missing, and lost 323 ofits 386 horses; the Württemberg infantry lost fifteen officers and 259soldiers. The Westphalians fared o better and Junot’scorps had some 3,000 killed, wounded and missing.

        至于骑兵部队，第4轻骑兵有一名军官战死，10人受伤，第6枪骑兵有四名军官战死，四名受伤。罗斯·冯·施莱根施坦（Roth von Schreckenstein）回忆道萨克森蒂勒曼（Thielemann）旅军官和士兵伤亡数分别为39人阵亡，29人负伤、287人阵亡，323人负伤，除此之外还损失了610匹马。普瑞辛·穆兹（Preysing-Moos）在他的日记中写到，巴伐利亚军队损失了5名军官和约100名士兵。根据冯·迪特福斯（von Dittfurth），符腾堡骑兵有34人阵亡，274人受伤，10人失踪，损失了323匹马（其编制内共有386匹）。而符腾堡 步兵损失了15名军官和259名士兵。威斯特伐利亚人也好不到哪里去，朱诺的军有约3000人阵亡、受伤、失踪。

Linsingen’s regiment had about 700 men in the morning butlost ten officers and 341 men. Maurice Tascher’s regiment, the 12th Chasseurs àCheval, lost ten officers and eighty-seven soldiers, while Vossler of the 3rdWürttemberg Jäger zu Pferde described how of the 180 men the regiment had beenable to muster that morning, half were either dead orwounded. The general commanding our division, General Waltier, and thebrigadier of our brigade, as well as their seconds-in-command, had all beenwounded and another senior divisional staff officer killed.

       林辛根（Linsingen）的团在上午还有700人，可他们损失了10名军官和341名战士。莫里斯·塔舍（MauriceTascher）的第12猎骑兵团损失了10名军官了87名士兵，而第3符腾堡猎骑兵团（Jäger zu Pferde）的沃斯勒（Vossler）则描述了团里180人早上集合的场景，而剩下的半数非死即伤。他的师长瓦尔特（Waltier）将军、旅长及副指挥们都挂了彩，另有一名师级高官在战斗都被杀。

      Casualties were high alsoamong the carabiniers and as Schehl, of the 2nd Carabiniers, revealed, ‘Afterthe roll call on 8 September, we became aware that 360 troopers and seventeenofficers were absent. My company lost all its officers; our sergeant-major ledus in the battle.’

        卡宾枪手们的损失也不容小视，第2卡宾枪的舍尔（Schehl）披露到“在9月8日的集合中，我们发觉360名战友和17名军官没有出现。我连队的军官全部损失了；军士长指挥我们继续战斗。”

      Accordingto Brandt, the Polish losses amounted to about 2,000 men, while MarianKukiel specified that one general, fifty-six officers and some 2,000soldiers of the V Corps were killed or wounded in the battle.

        勃兰特（Brandt）的数据中，波兰部队损失了大约2000人，而马里安库基尔（MarianKukiel）更详细的的说明，第五军在战斗中伤亡了1名将军,56名军官和约2000士兵。

      Morespecific information is available on Compans’division, whose battle reports were later published. Thus,according to Charrière’s report, the 57th Linelost over 1,230 men, including 236 missing. Martinien’s study reveals that theregiment lost 14 officers killed and twenty-six wounded. General Guyardetreported that his 61st Line suffered one officer and twenty-nine men killed,twelve officers and 226 men wounded, and seventeen captured in the fighting of5 September but discusses no casualties for Borodino; based on Martinien’s dataon officer casualties, the 61st Line probably lost about 400 men. Discussingthe Battle of Shevardino, Longchamp, of the 111th Line,initially reported 157 killed and 600 wounded, including twenty officers. Hisreport was revised on 30 September and showed four officers and eighty-two menkilled, fifteen officers and 540 men wounded and thirty-three captured.536In the 2nd Division, Dedem referred to 1,500 men lost in the 33rd Line,including 404 killed (forty-eight of them officers). His estimates seemsexaggerated since Martinien found only nine officers killed and nineteenwounded, which would indicate lower overall loss.

        孔潘（Compan）师随后公布的战斗报告中可以找到更多的细节。因此，根据查理尔（Charrière）的报告，第57线列步兵团损失超过1230人，包括236人失踪。马尔蒂尼安的研究报告披露该团军官14人阵亡，26人负伤。居亚尔特（Guyardet将军报告说在9月5日的战斗中，第61线列步兵团的损失为军官1死12伤，兵士29死226伤，另有17人被俘，可并未提及博罗季诺的战况。根据马尔蒂尼安的数据，该团可能承受了400人的伤亡。第11线列步兵团的隆尚（Longchamp）在舍瓦尔季诺的战斗后，起初报告说有157人战死，600人负伤，这其中包括了20名军官。他的报告在9月30日经过修订，给出的数据为4名军官、82名士兵阵亡，15名军官、540名士兵负伤，另有33人被俘。第2师，德代（Dedem）说第33线列步兵团有1500人的战损，当中404人被杀（包括48名军官）。他的统计似乎有些夸大，因为马尔蒂尼安只找到28名军官的伤亡情况（9死19伤）。

     Thedata on Russian casualties is more available but, although it has been longstudied, the debate still continues. The roll-calls of the 1st and 2nd WesternArmies and reports by regimental, division and corps commanders remain one ofthe most important sources on this subject. However, they are not withoutblemishes, often contradicting each other or containing duplications andmistakes. So they must be considered with a critical eye.

        相较而言，获得俄军的损失数据渠道更多，尽管对此的研究很早就开始了，可是争议也一直存在。第1和第2西军团存留下的团、师、军级主官的战斗报告和点阅情况是当前最重要的资料来源。当然这些资料并不是无懈可击，自相矛盾的地方与各种纰漏屡见不鲜。所以引用的时候一定要保持严谨的态度，不要过分相信资料。

王法拉

211页

The official roll-calls show that the 1st Western Army suffered the largestcasualties (21,727 men) but the 2nd Western Army, with 16,845 killed andwounded, sustained a higher percentage of losses. Their combined casualtiestotal 38,569 men, a figure that is often citedin Soviet studies. However, this number is misleading since it does not accountfor casualties among officers, Opolchenye and Cossack forces. Yet,another dossier, containing reports on the Russian casualties for the 1812–14campaigns, includes a report on the actions of 5–7 September showing sixgenerals and 166 officers killed, twenty-three generals and 438 officerswounded while up to 45,000 soldiers were dead and injured.537

        军官点阅真实展现了第1、2西军团的巨大损失，（第1西军团21727人战损，第2西军团16845人），伤亡率居高不下。两个军团总共有38569名战士（差了3个人？）倒下了，这一数据经常被苏联时代的资料所引用。可这个数据存在误导性，因为并没有计算军官、民兵和哥萨克的伤亡。在另一本包含了俄军1812-1814年战斗报告的档案中，有这样一份记录：在1812年9月5-7日的战斗中，俄军有6位将军和166名军官战死，23名将军和438名军官负伤，士兵伤亡在45000人左右。

      Severalattempts were made to correct these figures. Sergei Shvedov,who was among the first to challenge the official Soviet statistics back in the1980s, has recently argued that the Russian losses were close to 50,000 men.Although some historians accepted his figures, others scholars questioned hismethods and revealed considerable flaws in his research. Dmitri Tselorungo’sresearch showed 39,060 casualties and about 1,000 captured, while SergeiLvov’s study produced 39,297 casualties, of which 21,756 were in the1st Army and 17,541 – in the 2nd Army.538 These findings,however, lack statistics on artillery, Cossack and Opolchenye losses. Takingthem into account, the Russian casualties of 5–7 September will exceed 40,000men and might be close to 45,000 men. The recently published Otechestvennaya voina 1812 goda: Entsiklopediya,written by leading Russian scholars, refers to between 45,000 and 50,000losses.

        为了让数据更加贴近史实，人们一直在努力。最早的努力源自谢尔盖·什韦多夫（Sergei Shvedov），他在二十世纪八十年代对苏俄官方统计发起了挑战，认为俄军的损失应当在50000人上下。虽然有部分学者接受了他的数据，可是其他人仍然质疑其统计方法并披露了他研究中的缺陷。德米特里·（Dmitri Tselorungo）的成果显示俄军战损39060人，另有约1000人被俘，谢尔盖·利沃夫（Sergei Lvov）的结论则为39297人战损，第1西军团21756 人，第2西军团为17541人。不过这些研究未包含炮兵、民兵和哥萨克。如果把这些也计入，那俄军在在1812年9月5-7日的损失就会超过40000，可能逼近45000。最近出版的由俄国权威学者编写《Otechestvennaya voina 1812 goda: Entsiklopediya》，使用了45000-50000这一数据。

      Asmentioned above, Russian regimental reports are often incomplete, since theylist casualties of NCOs and rank-and-file to which those of officers and non-combatantsshould be added. Nevertheless, these documents reveal vast losses. The CombinedGrenadier Division, which counted 4,059 men in its eleven battalions on the eveof the battle, sustained a staggering loss of 62 per cent, losing 526 killed,1,224 wounded and 750 missing; it tallied only 1,559 men (95 out of 243 NCOs)or 38 per cent of its fighting force by 18 September. The VII Corps lost 5,978NCOs and rank-and-file, including 1,346 killed, and the VIII Corps – 9,260 men.The II and III Corps lost about 3,718 and 3,799 men respectively, while the VCorps lacked 4,891 men. In the infantry, the 6th Jägers suffered the highestcasualties with 910 killed, wounded and missing, followed by the VilenskiiInfantry Regiment (870), the Yeletskii Infantry Regiment (792), the Life GuardIzmailovskii (777) and the Life Guard Litovskii (693). The Life GuardPreobrazhenskii and Semeyonovskii Regiments, despite being held in reserve,still suffered substantial casualties from enemy artillery fire.

        如前所述，俄军团级报告经常有所遗漏，因为他们只计入军士和士兵的伤亡，而对军官和非战斗人员则未予添加。可是即便这样，报告所展示的伤亡仍然十分巨大。混成掷弹兵师在战前统计有11个营4059人，战斗中有526人阵亡，1224人负伤，750人失踪，损失率达到62%，其仅剩1559人（38%，另外243名军士中还有95人在岗）参加了9月18日战斗。第7军有5978名军士和士兵损失，内有1346人战死，第8军则损失了9260人。第2和第3军分别损失了3718和3799人，第5军缺员达4891人。步兵单位中第6猎兵团损失最高，有910人伤亡失踪，随后是维尔纳步兵团 (Vilenskii，870)，叶列茨步兵团（Yeletskii  ，792)，近卫伊斯梅洛夫（Izmailovskii ，777) 和近卫猎兵（Litovskii ，693)。至于近卫普列奥布拉任斯基团（Preobrazhenskii）和近卫谢苗诺夫斯基团（ Semeyonovskii）团，尽管作为预备队未直接投入战斗，也蒙受了敌人炮兵的不断轰击。

王法拉

212页

The cavalry fared no better, with 1,184 killed, wounded and missing in theII and III Cavalry Corps and over 320 men in the IV Cavalry Corps. TheAstrakhanskii Cuirassiers lost 231 men, including fifty-six killed andseventy-nine wounded; the Mariupolskii Hussars had 163 killed and thirty-fivewounded, while the Pskovskii Dragoons, which distinguished themselves incharges around the Grand Redoubt, had 101 killed, fifty-one wounded andthirty-two missing. The Akhtyrskii Hussars lost 160 men, the Sibirskii Dragoons– 156 men, the Glukhovskii Cuirassiers – 150, the Novgorodskii Cuirassiers –145, the Izumskii Hussars – 137 men, while the Sumskii Hussars andYekaterinoslavskii Cuirassiers lost 117 men each.

      骑兵的情况也不容乐观，第2、3骑兵军有1814人伤亡或失踪，第4骑兵军超过则320。阿斯特拉罕胸甲骑兵（Astrakhanskii）损失231人，当中56人被杀，79人负伤；马里乌波尔骠骑兵（Mariupolskii）有163人战死，35人挂彩，在大多面堡争夺中顽强出击而闻名普斯科夫（Pskovskii）龙骑兵为此付出了101人战死，51人负伤，32人失踪的代价。阿赫特尔卡骠骑兵（Akhtyrskii）损失160人，西伯利亚龙骑兵156人（Sibirskii，表格中为159人），格卢霍夫胸甲骑兵（Glukhovskii)150人，诺夫哥罗德胸甲骑兵（Novgorodskii）145人，伊久姆骠骑兵（Izumskii）137人，苏姆斯克骠骑兵(Sumskii)和叶卡捷琳诺斯拉夫胸甲骑兵(Yekaterinoslavskii)各损失117人。

The Russian artillery was also hard hit. The 1st Battery Company lostsixty-five men, the 5th Light Company – sixty-six, the 12th Light Company –forty-five, the 2nd Battery Company – thirty-two, the17th Battery Company – thirty-three and the 33rd Light Company – thirty. The5th Horse Artillery Company lost 110 men, including thirty-four killed,sixty-one wounded and fifteen missing, while 268 of its horses were dead orinjured. The 6th Horse Company was also badly mauled, with fifty-eight men andeighty-three horses killed and wounded.541 In the Guard HorseArtillery, commanders of both companies were killed and another 110 men werekilled or injured. In the 2nd Artillery Brigade, the 11th Battery Company losttwenty killed and seventy-two wounded, the 20th Light Company saw seven menkilled and twenty-four injured, while the 21st Light Company had eleven deadand thirty wounded. The batteries of the 3rd Reserve Brigade were not sparedeither; the 31st Battery Company of this brigade had twenty-six men killed,thirty-one wounded and 126 missing. The artillery roll-calls of the 2nd WesternArmy showed that fourteen NCOs and 103 privates were killed, twenty-seven NCOsand 309 privates wounded and ten NCOs and 168 privates were missing; theartillery also lost 143 horses.542

      俄军炮兵同样损失巨大。第1炮兵连损失了65人，第5轻炮连66人，第12轻炮连45人，第2炮兵连32人，第17炮兵连33人，第33轻炮连30人。第5骑炮连损失了110人，当中34人战死，61人负伤，15人失踪，所属的军马死伤268匹。第6骑炮连亦遭重创，有58人和87匹军马死伤。两个近卫炮兵连的指挥官全部阵亡，此外有110人的损失。在第2炮兵旅，第11炮兵连20人阵亡，27人负伤，第20轻炮连7人阵亡，24人负伤，而第21轻炮连11死30伤。第3预备炮兵旅也未能幸免，第31炮兵连26死31伤，还有126人失踪。第2西军团的炮兵清点为军士14死27伤10失踪，士兵103死309伤168失踪；所配的军马也损失了143匹。

王法拉

213页